|
Turning the Tables? |
|
Here is an example from the Shefferman school of subterfuge: Under
the real or even theoretical threat of a union, Shefferman advised
management to institute a device called an employee roundtable.
Purportedly designed to give workers a way to air their grievances and
influence company policy, in reality the roundtable becomes management’s
tap into the worker grapevine and its repressive thumb on the informal
worker power structure. The regular group meetings provided management
with a system for planting information, as well as for identifying and
controlling the leaders among the employees. Shefferman lays out the
blueprint for such roundtables in his book. Calling them “rotating
employee committees,” he presents the sessions as open forums, absent
any supervisors, opportunities for workers to gripe without fear of
reprisal. But the fact is, such committees serve management’s interest
more directly than the needs of the workers… Our Supervisors have indeed been undergoing their own training since this website went up. Remember, Supervisors had their own meetings when we had our captive audience meetings. Word has it that they have had smaller "meetings" with Harrah's Union busters since. Harveys/Harrah's does have its own "employee roundtable," and they call it “Turning the Tables.” Notice that the word “table” was not even removed from the device. Since this Union drive has started, they have been putting an increased emphasis on it, although, as you can see from the progress logged below, there is nothing substantial that has been accomplished for us. Harrah's did not listen to committee members about hour-twenties. It is clear that upper management is not going to listen to us when they do not have to. To those who have issues which have not been addressed: with our Union, we will have a genuine way to pursue those issues at our workplace that have been ignored. At first, many thought that "Turning the Tables" would be a good thing. We get to inform those above us what is wrong about our workplace, and there is nice, convenient venue in which to do it. Unfortunately, this is evidence that "Turning the Tables" is little more than a Union prevention tactic. It creates the illusion that we have some say over our issues in the workplace. Unfortunately, it is rare that an issue addressed directly benefits the worker. The only ones that are corrected affect the bottom line and are mostly minor investments that the casino should be making anyway in order to keep from losing customers. If there were some essential worker issues corrected as a result of the meetings, we would be more inclined to believe the sincerity of the title of this committee. There were 102 issues addressed in our last "Turning the Tables" newsletter. Here's a quick breakdown of what was addressed during the Spring-Summer '07 edition:
Of course, our management does know what it is doing, and "Turning the Tables" has had no impact on our real issues. We got a few fans and heaters but nothing substantial. They can pretend, from here on out, that "Turning the Tables" is for our benefit, but with the lack of accomplishments in the six months prior to the Union drive and lack of action on hour-twenties, we know better.
* It is not to our benefit if the Boston Celtics are in the playoffs, because all
Celtics games are excluded from action at Harrah's sports books, so
players wishing to bet on a Celtics game will have to go elsewhere.
This is due to
the NBA's concern about Gary Loveman's conflicting duties as both Harrah's
CEO and his partial ownership of the Celtics. |